Hi Roy,
The reason I started looking for other on-demand publishers is that I have a quarterly magazine with a circulation of under 20 (actually 20, NOT 20 thousand), and I’ve been using Lulu to get them printed. Lulu has a “no-touch” system wherein they can’t fix anything once you’ve placed the order, and this has caused me a problem twice. It seems that the efficiencies they achieve by doing things that way are worth the troubles though, because I have not yet found a printer that will bind a small number of high quality product for me for as low a price.
If I may bend your ear for a moment… My impetus for the magazine was to demonstrate something that is mathematically obvious, but in a way that the general public can understand and which can profit those willing to put in the effort. The mathematically obvious thing is that it is more useful to say one thing is better than another than to say whether or not a particular thing is good. In fact, the material published in my magazine is discovered through technology that asks website visitors to decide which of two submissions they like better.
The reason I wanted to share this with you is that all big website companies these days are trying to figure out how to balance the participation of site visitors against the provision of content that brings them back for more. It seems to me that the technology my site employs goes a long way to achieving this balance. As someone at Amazon who knows about what my site is doing, you may prove to be a valuable contact. In a nutshell, user participation is generally restricted to absolute judgements (“did you like this?”), but when it is expanded to allow relative judgments (“which did you like more?”), it becomes more engaging and also more valuable. If this idea interests Amazon, I’m available to explain more.