Home | News | Site Map | Search | Contact

 

The News

Current Events and Continuing Education for April 25 through May 8, 2014

“Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.”

-James Madison

My October 23, 2013 interview by Lana Lotkeff for Radio 3Fourteen can be found here.

Please Start Here

Features in this edition:

(Click on the underlined text to jump to each feature. To return, use your browser's "back" button, or close the new tab or window to which you have jumped.)

Taking things to the next level:

THE FIRST ANNUAL CtC SUMMER SYMPOSIUM!

***

And the hits just keep on comin'!

Four New Victories To Share

***

Dealing with the oozing corruption...

Motions Are Filed Against The Government's Second Bite At  Doreen

***

When will this blind stubbornness end?!

Giving A Tax-Keynesian A Little Schooling

***

This week's recommended reading:

Barack Pulls a "W": Lies, Misinformation and Chemical Weapons

***

 The Supremes sink a bank-shot; IRS bonuses; Texas pushback; more...

On This And That...

***

Like rust, corruption never sleeps

It's YOUR LAW People, But Only If YOU Insist It Be Respected

***

The most important question facing Americans today:

What Do The People Do About The Rogue State?

***

Guess what? There are only two possibilities:

You Either Stand Up For The Truth, Or You've Surrendered To The Lie

***

Spotlights on the past that help bring clarity to the present:

Illuminating Anniversaries for this week

***

Got something to say?

Your Comments

***

...and much, much more!

 

Click here for the current Mid-Edition Update posts

"There are two distinct classes of men...those who pay taxes and those who receive and live upon taxes."

- Thomas Paine

 

C'mon! CtC can't be right! You're crazy!

If CtC were actually right,

it would mean the government's been concealing and denying the truth for years on end,

and everybody knows THAT would never happen...

(Edward Snowden, come home! It was all just a bad dream; there really is No Such Agency!)

 

 

Do you know someone truly steeped in the Kool-Aid?

 

 I mean someone who finds it easier to believe that the far-better-educated, far-more-suspicious-of-government Americans of a hundred years ago were complete morons who granted authority to the state to take whatever it wished from themselves and their posterity than to imagine that they themselves simply misunderstand the true nature of the income tax? Even while knowing that their beliefs about the tax are derived entirely from the representations of those who profit from those beliefs (like tax bureaucrats and "tax professionals")?

 

Do you know someone like that? Shake them awake with the latest (thirteenth) edition of CtC!

 

 

I'm delighted when anyone wishes to share what I have posted here with others! Sharing this page is an important means of moving toward the restoration of the rule of law-- PLEASE DO IT!! But I'd appreciate your doing so by directing your friends here themselves, rather than by copying and emailing the material.

 

***

 

You can't understand the present if you don't understand the past...

Illuminating anniversaries of this week:

April 25- In 1846, a U.S. patrol excursion across the Texas border into Mexico precipitates the Mexican-American War.  In 1859, ground is broken for the Suez Canal.  In 1898, the United States declares war on Spain, using the pretext of the mysterious sinking of the USS Maine in a Cuban harbor.  The war resulted in U.S. claims of ownership of the Philippines, Guam, and Puerto Rico, and a more limited sovereignty over Cuba.  In 1916, Britain declares martial law in Ireland in response to the Easter Uprisings.  In 1953, the structure of DNA is described.  In 1961, the integrated circuit is patented.  In 1983, Pioneer 10, launched March 2, 1972, passes the orbit of Pluto.

Anniversaries of interest for each day of this week will be found throughout the newsletter below.

 

"It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men."

-Samuel Adams

Symposium

The First Annual CtC Summer Symposium

I AM PLEASED TO ANNOUNCE THE SCHEDULING OF THE FIRST ANNUAL CtC SUMMER SYMPOSIUM, which will immediately precede this years Seventh Annual Declaration Day Party. This event will bring together expert speakers and educated Americans from across the country for two days of enriching and inspirational focus on:

  • The legal and political history of the income tax;

  • The nature of the American Constitutional and legal structure overall;

  • The principles and procedures at play in an accurate, educated filing;

  • Effective presentation in an administrative and legal contest;

  • Dealing with "legacy" filing (or non-filing) issues;

  • How to work with social media;

  •  How to engage in effective outreach;

  • More...

SO, MARK YOUR CALENDARS AND MAKE YOUR PLANS to be part of this important inaugural event in SE Michigan July 3rd and 4th-- and at the Seventh Annual Declaration Day party the following day, July 5th!

To cover the costs of the venue and related expenses, there will be a $20 per-person charge to attend. Seating will be limited and by reservation only. Reserve your seats now by sending payment to Peter Hendrickson, 232 Oriole Rd., Commerce Twp., Michigan 48382

Bookmark this page-- details of speakers, schedule, venue and available accommodations will be posted and updated here regularly.

Care to post a comment on this article?

Return to contents

*****

Four New Victories To Share This Week

PEOPLE, LET'S CELEBRATE SOME NEWLY-SHARED VICTORIES! These refunds of everything withheld and deposited with state tax agencies as pre-payments against any possible "income" tax liability were all recently shared with me for sharing with you.

Eric Howarth shares his first two victories today; the others are each second victories for the happy warriors involved.

Honor these real American heroes, and Enjoy!

Eric Howarth

 

2011 NC check

The return producing this 2011 victory can be seen here.

 

2012NC refund

This one's for 2012

 


 

Larry _

 

2012 Utah Refund

2012

 


 

D. & K. S.

 

2012 California Refund

2012

 

These victories join the tens of thousands of others continuously being secured since 2003 by CtC-educated, grown-up Americans standing tall for the rule of law. Where are yours?

 

Care to post a comment on this article?

 

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

 

The Liberating Truth About The 16th Amendment

IF YOU'RE NOT SPREADING THIS LINK with every bit of energy you can, to school libraries, homeschool families and community groups, your neighbors, your family members, your pastors and co-congregationalists, journalists, lawyers, CPAs, members of congress, tax-agency workers, Wikipedia, Anonymous, WikiLeaks, the Tax Foundation, everyone in the "tax honesty" movement, the 9/11 truth movement, other activist movements and everyone else, you have only yourself to blame for your troubles with the tax, and a whole lot else of which you might complain. It's on you.

WRITE A NICE, FRIENDLY AND BRIEF introductory note explaining what will be seen at the link-- cryptic is bad; excited is good-- and then send this WMI (weapon of mass instruction) far and wide.

"I am a great believer in luck, and I find the harder I work, the more I have of it."

-Thomas Jefferson

 

A teacher asked her 6th grade class how many of them were fans of Big Government.
 
 Not really knowing what a Big Government fan is, but wanting to be liked by the
 teacher, all the kids raised their hands except for Little TJ.
 
 The teacher asked Little TJ why he has decided to be different...again.
 
 Little TJ said, "Because I'm not a fan of Big Government."
 
 The teacher asked, "Why aren't you a fan of Big Government?"
 
 Little TJ said, "Because I'm a libertarian."
 
 The teacher asked him why he's a libertarian.  Little TJ answered, "Well, my Dad's a libertarian and my Mom's a libertarian, so I'm a libertarian."
 
 Annoyed by this answer, the teacher asked, "If your dad were a moron and your mom were an idiot, what would that make you?"
 
 With a big smile, Little TJ replied, "That would make me a fan of Big Government."

 

Illuminating anniversaries of this week:

April 26- In 1607, English colonists make landfall at Cape Henry, Virginia before going on to establish Jamestown.  In 1865, Confederate General Joseph Johnson surrenders to Union General William Tecumseh Sherman near Durham, North Carolina; and John Wilkes Booth is reportedly found and killed by Union cavalry troops in North Virginia.  In 1933, the Gestapo is established in Germany.  In 1982, a South Korean police officer spends eight hours using his department-issued weapons (and a few others selected from the police armory) systematically killing 57 civilians-- most in their homes, but the first three being the local telephone exchange operators.

 

Real Americans don't accommodate fog, lies and a sliding scale of adherence to the rule of law. Real American men and women stand up for the truth and the law, come what may, knowing that it is only by setting the bar at the top and enforcing it, come what may, that liberties are secured.

 

"Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as freedom should not be highly rated."

-Thomas Paine

 

Motions Are Filed Against The Government's Second Bite At Doreen

Many of you will find these of interest...

SOME OF YOU WILL HAVE BEEN AWARE OF THE FACT THAT MY ATTENTION WAS OCCUPIED over the last few weeks, resulting in my neglect of some emails. I apologize, but writing the motions posted below had to take precedence.

Many of you will find these motions and supporting arguments to be of interest for various reasons. You will also find it interesting (and more than a little disgusting) that the government attorneys actually oppose the motion to have Doreen's cousin, who was too sick to testify in the first trial, and who suffers from debilitating, liver failure from which she could literally die any day without warning, deposed in order to preserve her testimony.

ANOTHER INTERESTING THING IS THE GOVERNMENT ATTORNEYS' "counter-motion" filed on a hurry-up basis this Monday (the last day possible) right after reading our motion seeking to have US attorneys barred from cell-phone possession in the re-trial due to their egregious abuse of the privilege previously. The counter-motion asks for official permission for the government to use lap-tops in the courtroom instead...

Motion To Dismiss

Motion to Dismiss or Revise Indictment

Motion To Bar Cell-Phones

Motion for Deposition Order

IF YOU AREN'T ALREADY FAMILIAR WITH THIS OUTRAGEOUS ASSAULT ON THE RULE OF LAW, which is being pursued purely in order to suppress the liberating, state-restraining truth about the tax and perpetuate a corrupt abuse of Americans' generous assumptions about the goodwill and honesty of their public servants, click here.

 

The Honor Roll 

Do you have a victory to share?  Click here to learn how to do so.

If you're working on one, and just getting stonewalled or speed-bumped, you can still be recognized! Go here to learn what to do.

 

Care to post a comment on this article?

 

Return to contents

Giving A Tax-Keynesian A Little Schooling

FOLKS WHO STILL CLING TO STATIST MYTHOLOGY ABOUT THE INCOME TAX AND ASSOCIATED LAW are like Keynesians in the realm of economics. They are seemingly incapable of recognizing (or admitting) that they were wrong and that the Austrians are right, no matter how overwhelming the evidence.

Kind of tragicomically, as much as they would vehemently protest against it, these stubborn statists are also adherents to the doctrine of "living law". After all, they take as authoritative of the scope of the tax merely what the current power structure would like everyone to believe it is.

The "income tax Keynesians" embrace the latest power-preferred-belief despite the fact that it is contrary to what the tax laws actually say and contrary to what the courts have said about those laws. They embrace the latest power-preferred-belief even though it's contrary to what those who enacted both the relevant statutes and the Constitutional provisions to which they must conform plainly said they meant them to be.

In fact, when obliged to do so by educated Americans, even the powers-that-be themselves acknowledge that the belief they want everyone to harbor about the tax is untrue, and that the tax remains just as it was written. But the Keynesians persist in arguing that the tax has been transformed into what the powers-that-be simply want people to believe about it. Like it or not, that's deeming the tax laws to be "living laws."

I IMAGINE THE  "INCOME TAX KEYNESIANS" BELIEVE the Fourth Amendment actually allows for warrantless seizure of everyone's papers and effects, anytime the state wants them. After all, it's what the state wants everyone to believe is true about the amendment's meaning.

These Keynesians must also believe the Second Amendment doesn't reflect Constitutional respect for non-state-controlled citizen possession of weapons. After all, the state has long struggled mightily to get everyone to believe that the amendment only concerns some kind of state-regulated "group right".

I SUPPOSE THESE "INCOME TAX" KEYNESIANS MUST STILL BE IN A SORT OF DENIAL/SHOCK MODE over the IRS having given everyone in the country a "rebate" on illegally collected "phone taxes" in 2007. After all, the state had been collecting them for decades, even over the sustained protest of many Americans.

Those in power had vigorously and persistently encouraged everyone to believe that those phone taxes were valid. Even though the "phone tax" took in a mere pittance, and its misapplication relied entirely on a 8th-grade-education-obvious misconstruction of a single word ("and"), it was vigorously defended in court by the DOJ on behalf of the IRS for years.

By the metric of the "income tax Keynesians", then, the "phone tax" MUST have been legal. What the law creating it actually says, or what those who enacted it meant it to be are irrelevant to its legitimacy.

So when 6 out of 6 federal circuit courts finally admitted eight years ago that the decades-old "phone tax" application to most Americans had actually been CONTRARY to the real meaning and effect of the law all that time, the tax Keynesians must have in shock. They must have thought, "The tax had been being collected! The powers that be wanted us all to believe the tax applied as they were applying it! Why did these courts even LOOK at the words of the law itself? WE don't! After all, what do THEY matter?! The meaning of the law is whatever the current-powers-that-be have convinced everyone to believe that it is!"

Sadly, the ill effects of that shock persist. Despite that nice object lesson, these Keynesians can't bring themselves to shine its light on the "income tax".

Maybe it's because what the powers-that-be want everyone to believe about the "income tax"-- which DOESN'T bring in a "mere pittance", and is the #1 statist weapon against individual self-determination-- is SO much more vigorously defended than was the misapplied "phone tax". The ubiquitous, systemic character of the infectious defensive mythology deployed on behalf of state defiance of the truth about the income tax is so powerful as to drive even the obvious lesson of the "phone tax" out of the Keynesians' minds.

ANYWAY, CtC-EDUCATED SCHOLAR GREG SUTTON has generously made an effort to shake one of the leading members of the "Keynesian school of tax pundits"-- Jacob Hornberger (founder and president of the Future of Freedom Foundation)-- out of his shocked state and into the sunlight.

Greg's effort is prompted by Hornberger's recent "tax-day"-timed posts inanely calling for the abolition of the income tax based on taking the representations of the nature of the tax by the powers-that-be at face value (and bouncing off some ill-educated mid-Twentieth-Century writings on the subject by the otherwise usually very worthwhile essayist Frank Chodorov). Such abolitionist calls simply support and advance the statist mythology about the tax, and serve only to fasten its misapplication ever more tightly on everyone else. They are completely irresponsible and shamefully un-American.

Greg's admonition against the dark side and his invitation to Hornberger to step into the light is a pitch-perfect model of how this kind of effort should be made. I am pleased to share it with you all, both so that Greg can be duly appreciated for this excellent work, and so that everyone else can benefit from this great example of how to proceed with similar neighborly efforts of their own directed at Hornberger and other "income tax Keynesians.

Remember, friends don't let friends harbor and spread dangerous nonsense.

Hi Jacob,

As a long-time libertarian and regular reader of FFF Daily I'm generally in lock-step with your knowledge and beliefs within the libertarian/classical liberal context. But when it comes to the income tax we are far apart. Very far apart indeed. 

Sir, I am no slouch when it comes to understanding the income tax within the libertarian/classical liberal context. I have done the research, spent the necessary time and effort as have many others who wear the libertarian label. We have dared to move past Chodorov's clouded view of the tax, something we urge you to muster the courage to consider. Quite honestly, we are embarrassed for your ignorance in this vital-for-freedom subject matter and would like to facilitate your learning the truth.

For a man learned in the law I am surprised you didn't pick up on the fact that Chodorov doesn't discuss the Brushaber or Stanton rulings anywhere in the book. The Brushaber case was intentionally granted certiorari by the SCOTUS to settle once and for all the question of what was the purpose and meaning of the 16th Amendment.

The recognized understanding at the time was that the purpose of the amendment was to overturn the Pollock decision and return to Congress its full power to tax the incomes of those engaged in the exercise of federal government privilege. (See the ninth excise/duty of Blackstone's list.) But a supposed expert on taxation, Professor of Political Economy at Columbia, E. R. A. Seligman, a German Historical School educated socialist and member of the growing class of elite intellectuals influencing popular opinion through the "expert" bully-pulpit of intellectual journals very popular in the late 1800's and early 1900's, in his 1911 tome The Income Tax, had posited the view that the purpose of the 16th Amendment was to allow a general, direct income tax without apportionment.

 The SCOTUS had earlier recognized a disagreement with these political economists in Scholey and in Knowlton as to their understanding of the distinctions between direct and indirect taxation. This was again the case in Brushaber. The court ruled unanimously that Brushaber, and thereby Seligman, had no idea about what they were talking about.

The ruling reiterated the fact that the income tax is in the nature of an excise and is enforced as such. An excise is a privilege tax.

Thus the income tax is a privilege tax on the exercise of federal government privilege and always has been and forever will be.  That, in a nutshell, is the income tax within the libertarian/classical liberal ideological context and the supreme law of the land. Whereas the source for your and Chodorov's historically unfounded beliefs is a German educated socialist who had visions of grandeur as a member of the braintrust of big intrusive government. No wonder we are embarrassed for you.

Get up to speed with this essay.

If I can help in any way to get you over the hurdle that misinformation, habit and fear have created in your mind feel free to contact me. There are tens of thousands of Americans, including myself, who have jumped over that hurdle  and learned the truth about the tax. A man of your intellect, with a legal education to boot, should have no trouble with the material, other than it trashes a life time of miseducation.

It's tough to admit that you've been lied to your whole life about the income tax especially if you have been espousing those lies from your hard earned bully pulpit your whole life too. But once you realize the uber significance to freedom in general and the libertarian community specifically the damaged ego will understand.

 I urge you to get on with your new-found knowledge, we need your voice.

In liberty,

Gregory Sutton

Care to post a comment on this article?

 

Return to comments

 

Test Your "Income" Tax IQ!

CtC Warrior SanDiegoScott has put together a great little 20-question quiz to test your knowledge of the law regarding the United States "income" tax.  Test yourself, test your friends and family!  Test your accountant and tax attorney, and help them learn the liberating truth!!

 

Click here to take the test

 

Click here for more Tax IQ tests

 

 

 

“Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.”

-James Madison

 

How About You?

 

Are You Governing Yourself?

 

Get The Knowledge, Reclaim Your Power, And Stand With The Founders

 

Have You Visited This Page Yet?

 

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

 

 

THIS WEEK'S RECOMMENDED READING:

Barack Obama Pulls a George W. Bush: Lies, Misinformation and Chemical Weapons

by Patrick L. Smith

Am I misjudging our time, or have we entered some accelerated cycle of American subversions, and then another cycle of coverups and disinformation that do not quite come off? In less than a year, the Obama administration has mounted four covert coup operations, all variants of the classic Cold War model, all costly of human life, all assuring us the contempt and animosity of many people for years to come.

In chronological order:

* The American-authorized coup in Egypt last July. In the disinformation universe, Washington watched at a distance. Since the coup, dead silence in the face of a blood bath, except for Secretary of State Kerry’s applause for the Egyptian army’s “restoration of democracy.”

* In the war to depose Syria’s Bashar al-Assad, the linchpin event is the chemical-weapons attack last Aug. 21. We are invited — required, actually — to believe Assad allowed U.N. inspectors in to determine responsibility for previous gas attacks and then launched another attack near Damascus while the inspectors were settled in their hotel rooms.

* The role of the U.S. and its European allies in financing, fomenting and steering the direction of the Ukraine coup requires little discussion at this point. Rather bizarrely in the face of all we have on record, the Obama people continue to insist Ukraine is nothing more than a case of Russian overreach. As order unravels in the eastern sections of the country, it is important to bear in mind the chronology of events — and from the beginning, not somewhere in the middle.

* In Venezuela, the foreign minister recently read aloud portions of intercepted cable traffic documenting American subterfuge. No, no, no: Nicolás Maduro, successor to the late Hugo Chávez, is just as paranoid as his mentor, and both were merely trying to distract Venezuelans from their economic problems. (Vigilance is always essential when Washington and the hacks marshal the “distraction” thesis.)

Cuba could go on this list, given news of Washington’s operation of a social-media network on Cuban soil via the customary collection of front companies, except that intruding covertly in Cuba is so routine as to be (appallingly) unremarkable.

I find this an exceptionally busy schedule for the spooks and the nation-building set. We can explore the reasons on another occasion; for now, it seems also unusual that so much of what in an earlier time would remain hidden from view is not.

Continued...

Click here to read the rest of this article

***

Aren't you REALLY, REALLY glad YOU'VE taken control of how much of YOUR WEALTH facilitates Washington's misbehavior?!

 

If you haven't, what the hell is wrong with you?!

 

Do you not understand how IRRESPONSIBLE YOU ARE for not having done so?

 

WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU??!!

 

Even as ardent a statist as Abraham Lincoln, in announcing his willingness to burn the Southern states to the ground in order to keep them paying the tariff for the benefit of Northern interests in his first inaugural address on March 4, 1861, paid at least lip service to the Founders design of leaving control over the fuel available to feed the fires Washington wants to light in the hands of the individual citizenry when he said, "Doing this I deem to be only a simple duty on my part; and I shall perform it, unless my rightful masters, the American people, shall withhold the requisite means..."

 

Held over:

Disinformation-How it works

by Brandon Smith

*****

'The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude'

by Étienne de la Boétie

*****

Return to contents

 

Illuminating anniversaries of this week:

April 27- In 1773, the British Parliament grants a monopoly of tea imports into North America to the politically-connected British East India Company.  In 1861, Lincoln suspends habeas corpus in order to facilitate his suppression of dissent against his policies.  In 1945, Benito Mussolini is captured by Italian partisans while trying to escape Italy disguised as a German soldier.  In 1974, 10,000 march in Washington calling for Richard Nixon's impeachment.  In 2002, the last successful signal exchange with the Pioneer 10 spacecraft takes place as it continues its journey toward interstellar space.

 

There is little more important to the long-term health of America than how our children are educated..

HOMESCHOOL YOUR KIDS!

 

 

Want to get on the Newsletter mailing list?  Just email your name to SubscribeMe 'at' losthorizons.com using the address you want added!

 

Page Two

This And That

The Supreme Court sinks a bank-shot; IRS bonuses; Texas pushback; more...

NOW AND THEN EVEN TODAY'S UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT GETS ONE RIGHT--even if often not for the right reasons. Tuesday was such an occasion, as the court overruled a nonsensical Sixth Circuit Appellate ruling and upheld Michigan's referendum-enacted constitutional ban on discrimination in public university admissions, public employment and public contracting.

It's only a shame that the court insisted on clinging to, and making their ruling against, only the pinched and perverted Plaintiff's argument that the ban somehow compromises political access for those who favor discrimination (which they insist on calling "affirmative action"). Far better would it have been for the court to have observed that however the Plaintiff chose to construct and characterize its argument, what it amounted to was a plea in favor of discrimination, and as such, it had to fail.

 *****

GUESS WHAT? THE IRS HAS GIVEN BONUSES TO ITS TAX-CHEATIN' EMPLOYEES. Is this a great government, or what?! Read about this slap in America's face here, and be glad this isn't being done with YOUR money.

*****

TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL GREG ABBOTT IS SHOWING US WHAT OUGHT TO BE everyone's first reaction to anything done by the feds. A federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM) plan to claim control of a big chunk of property inside Texas borders has come to light, and Abbott is properly taking a default position of, "Sorry, I don't think so...":

TexasAGLetter1

TexasAGLetter2

 I hope Abbott sticks to his guns, with that great little bon mot you see on many a sign along the highway in his fine state: "Don't mess with Texas." Pushback should be EVERYONE'S default reaction to Leviathan now. It's a healthy habit for the spirits of free people.

*****

DO YOU KNOW WHY THE LIBERATING TRUTH ABOUT THE INCOME TAX is spreading so slowly, and not being taken up and trumpeted by the alt-media (at least)? Do you know why that truth is not a big presence in public consciousness, supporting you in your conversations on the subject with your friends, family, co-workers, bosses and professional service-providers?

The reason is that very often when someone first hears about that truth, the next thing he or she does is go to the internet and "google" CtC or me. What comes up in greatest number or most prominence can strongly influence whether that person moves forward or backward, and unfortunately, what often comes up most strongly are DOJ and troll posts rich with disparaging and misleading propaganda about either subject. The reason this is so is because YOU are not posting contrary material rebutting the lies and misrepresentations.

If we are all going to get the benefit of this liberating truth, I cannot be the only voice correcting the record on the internet about "what the courts have REALLY ruled" in regard to CtC. I can't be the only one debunking the efforts to disparage CtC by misrepresentations of the kangaroo-court assaults on me.

Whether the truth wins out here involves a battle of pens, not swords. YOU HAVE TO BE IN THIS BATTLE, or it may not be won for years. On the other hand, if you DO get into this battle and get thoughtful posts up all over the internet designed to address the specific problem I describe here, it can be won very quickly indeed. Please do your part.

 Care to post a comment on this article?

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

Return to contents

Are You Ready For "Obamacare"? Not Unless You've Read This...

 

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

 

It's YOUR LAW, People-- But Only If YOU Insist It Be Respected

Here's a way to do that, and a proper occasion:

Dear [Editor, Mom, Journalist, Buddy, Pastor, Colleague...]

I never thought I would see the day in this country when I could be ordered to sign my name to words dictated by the United States government, not to mention words I believe to be false. I've seen this sort of thing on TV where American hostages are giving testimonials with ski-masked, armed captors ensuring that the Americans spoke the words that would spare their lives.

With considerable dismay, I now see our judiciary employing the same tactics that terrorists impose on their victims. Doreen Hendrickson has been ordered to perjure herself, that is to sign her name to documents that say things the government wants said, even though she believe these things to be false.

Seven years ago, Federal Judge Nancy Edmunds (ED Michigan) ordered Doreen to make this false testimony, and to declare that it is her own testimony. Three-and-a-half  years later Edmunds added a requirement that the fact that the testimony is coerced and not Doreen's own be concealed (as asked of her by the IRS and DOJ).

Doreen now faces trial on charges of criminal contempt of court for resisting these plainly illegal orders. This is not the first trial, though-- it is the second government shot at Doreen.

The trial judge in Doreen's first trial last October actually ordered the jury to disregard the unconstitutionality of the orders Doreen is accused of "criminally resisting" (at the request of the team of attorneys from Washington flown in to prosecute her). Doreen, completely a legal amateur in every way, took on the government's conviction-by-any-means-necessary specialists all by herself. Still, the government could not get the jury to convict.

Despite the huge effort put on by the team of three DOJ attorneys during the four-day trial, at least some members of the jury recognized that the law and the facts are entirely on Doreen's side. But the government desperately wants this conviction. It views the preservation of certain key myths about the income tax to be at stake, and so it is coming back at Doreen again.

Let me be clear. Doreen is not being put through this for refusing to testify. She HAS already testified. The government just doesn't like what she said, and is trying to coerce her into saying things more to its interests. (Can you say: suborning perjury? How about: raw, banana-republic-level corruption?)

Though the testimony involved is on tax returns, this fact is not relevant. The only relevant issue is that a federal judge has completely overstepped her authority.

No one in this country can legally compel custom testimony...Not on a tax form...Not on a contract... NOT ON ANYTHING!!!

Please help to uphold the principles on which this country was founded. Today, it's Doreen and a tax form. Tomorrow...

Please join me in taking serious notice of this precipitous descent into Stalinism in an America already dangerously far down the road to complete lawlessness and barbarism.

Read the document that follows. Some of the material will be easy, some will call for a little more effort, but all will be crystal clear, even the legal briefs linked at the end.

Remember, in this country, the law is YOUR law, and the only ones who can enforce it against government operatives who take liberties with the rules are the rest of us. They can't be relied upon to police themselves, as what you are about to read will make obvious.

Sincerely Yours,

Where Are All The Journalists? Where Is Your Outrage?

We haven't ever before had a trial for heresy in America, but one is on the docket now...

BACK IN WHAT WE ALL LIKE TO THINK OF AS A DISTANT PAST, the ways of which are universally viewed with derision, contempt and condemnation as both simple-minded and barbaric, people were sometimes accused of "heresy". The crime was the profession of a belief which "the authorities" wished to go unspoken.

The fictional pretext for criminalizing heresy was that the heretic really knew better than what she errantly professed, because the officially-approved beliefs are presumed to be unmistakable established truths. They wouldn't be the "officially-approved" beliefs otherwise, don't you see, and anyone too dense to recognize them like everyone else has done must know them to be such truths anyway, because of that "official approval".

A heretic could therefore be properly punished for lying and properly made to declare instead what the authorities knew she really knew to be true. Further, the crime wasn't just an individual perjury; a heretic's continued profession of her errant beliefs, and her failure to recant and instead profess the favored view, would infect the minds of others with her seditious beliefs.

Perhaps the best known victim of this tyrannical practice was Galileo Galilei. Galileo was accused of heresy for declaring his belief that the Earth revolved around the Sun, contrary to the official view at the time.

Sorry to say, Galileo recanted his perfectly correct conclusions and was spared being burned at the stake. (He was sentenced to house arrest for the rest of his life anyway, for having lied in the first place as proven by his recantation, and as warning against the next person who might be tempted to publicly declare a belief contrary to the "official" one that everybody knows to be true, the right to do so having been something else Galileo had asserted as part of his "heresy").

Popular resistance to this manifestly improper rationalization for the exercise of state power against an individual was overcome with the sly claim that it was all about saving the souls of the accused, since heresies were purportedly rejections of God. This was combined with the unspoken but obvious threat that anyone who objected too strongly to the assault on any "heretic" could be readily tarred as being a heretic himself, and would become the next in line for the attention of the inquisitor.

The real goal, of course, was the suppression of information, conclusions and beliefs which threatened to take hold in the minds of others and undermine the status quo. Those in power understand that the reason things are the way they are, with themselves on top, is because of the way things are. They strive mightily to prevent change-- especially change in the perceptions of those capable of taking away their power.

***

A "TRIAL" FOR HERESY WAS SOMETIMES KNOWN AS an "auto de fe"-- an "act of faith". Once the relevant tribunal (the "inquisitor", generally) had determined that the charged expression qualified as heresy, the accused would be given a chance to recant her disfavored belief and declare her adherence to a position the powers-that-be found more to their liking. If stubborn, the accused would be tortured for a while to help her remember that deep down inside she knew the truth of the favored view and the error of her own (or that deep down, she really didn't believe her professed view at all).

If an accused heretic were to recant (under the influence, or anticipatory fear, of the torture or other penalties of continued contumaciousness), she might still be punished, but not so badly as otherwise. If she did not, things would be the worse for her...

Barbaric and simple-minded, right? Thing of the past, yes?

Indeed, this kind of thing is expressly prohibited in America by virtue of the First Amendment guarantee of freedom of expression and conscience, isn't it?

NOT ANYMORE.

This very day Doreen Hendrickson faces a charge of heresy. Doreen has been charged with criminal contempt of court for refusing to recant a belief about a matter of law which she has repeatedly declared under oath, and to replace it with a contrary statement declaring that she believes something the government would prefer her to say.*

Doreen was ordered to declare this government-dictated "belief" over her sworn signature attesting that it is her own belief. She was also ordered to lie about the fact that the recantation and contrary, government-dictated declaration are by command of the court, so as to perfect the appearance that these are things done of her own accord and truly reflect what she herself really believes to be true and correct.

What's more, the "belief" that Doreen was ordered to declare is that her earnings qualify for the "income tax". Plainly, this is something either objectively true or not, irrespective of Doreen Hendrickson's beliefs, meaning that the order can have no legitimate practical or legal purpose.

Further, Doreen is ordered to declare this "belief" on her own tax form, the legal effect of which is to authorize the government to impose a tax on those earnings. The government has been unable to assess a tax on these earnings, even over the course of the 11 years that have passed since some of them were received-- because, in fact, her earnings do NOT qualify for the tax, as this history, and the very fact that the government is trying to force Doreen to agree that they do, should make clear to anyone old enough to be out of kindergarten.

Thus, the coerced lies ordered by the government and the court assault not only the very core of liberty-- freedom of speech and conscience. They also assault the principle of "due process" as well, under which no one can be forced to declare agreement with a legal adversary's view of the facts.

More, these corrupt orders don't simply serve the state's corrupt political interest overtly declared in the court's order, which explained itself as intended to discourage others who "imitate" Doreen and "file false tax returns"-- returns which, in their tens of thousands over a full decade now and even when striven mightily against, the government has been unable to overcome by any legal means and which are plainly NOT "false", like the educated amended return that produced this complete refund-- with interest-- for Henry and Kathleen:

 

No, these corrupt orders have the added dimension of serving the direct and immediate financial interest of those in control of the state, as well, because that's really what this is all about.

I THINK EVERY RATIONAL AMERICAN CAN AGREE that it's one thing for the state to tell someone that she must declare what she believes, and it's rather another for the state to tell someone WHAT she must declare she believes. The one is mere "discovery". The other is rankest tyranny.

Doreen's trial ended in a hung jury, thanks to her good fortune in ending up with one or more real Americans being among those into whose hands this case was put. But if everyone's right to freedom of speech and conscience is to still be preserved when the government comes back at her again next summer, we all need to make some noise about this assault, and keep on making it.

“Liberty is meaningless where the right to utter one’s thoughts and opinions has ceased to exist. That, of all rights, is the dread of tyrants. It is the right which they first of all strike down. They know its power. Thrones, dominions, principalities, and powers, founded in injustice and wrong, are sure to tremble, if men are allowed to reason…”

-Frederick Douglass

 

*Motions filed in this case, which reveal the nature of the charge and the history of the issues involved can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here.

 

Care to post a comment on this article?

 

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

 

Return to contents

 

Illuminating anniversaries of this week:

April 28- In 1788, Maryland becomes the seventh state to ratify the United States Constitution.  In 1945, Italian fascist dictator Benito Mussolini is executed by fed-up Italian citizens.  In 1947, Thor Heyerdahl sets out from Peru bound for Polynesia on the Kon-Tiki raft to prove that it could be done.  In 1952, the post-World War II occupation of Japan ends after 6 1/2 years.  In 1996, President Bill Clinton testifies for the defense in the "Whitewater" land fraud, conspiracy and political corruption trial of his and Hillary's partners Jim and Susan MacDougall and then-Arkansas governor Jim Guy Tucker.

What Do The People Do About The Rogue State??

The most important question facing Americans today

I HAD THIS QUESTION POSED TO ME BY AN EMAIL CORRESPONDENT the other day. I guess this just shows how poor a job I've done at communicating, because I have been trying to shout the answer to this one from the rooftops for a long time.

That answer is simple: The People impose restraint on the rogue state by choosing-- one by one-- to cease voluntarily turning control over their resources to the state, and choosing instead to retain control over those resources. This is done by refusing-- one by one-- to engage in "income tax" excisable activities (and refusing to blindly or fearfully allow their activities to be treated or taken as excisable activities upon which the tax arises, when they really are not).

The refusal of individual Americans to voluntarily engage in excisable activities forces the state to resort to highly-politically-accountable, highly-politically-vulnerable alternatives revenue sources. These include options like direct, apportioned taxes (which will not be tolerated by the people or approved by Congress at $multi-trillion annual volumes), and/or increased revenue tariffs (which can raise amounts adequate for legitimate state needs, but are very self-regulating, since consumers naturally choose domestic product alternatives when higher tariffs raise the prices of imports beyond a certain point).

This solution is precisely the one intended and provided for by the Founders-- who didn't impose the taxation rules in the US Constitution just so they could admire their handwriting. They put those rules in place in direct anticipation of state behavior of the sort with which we are now plagued.

 As even so odious a character as Hamilton pointed out in Federalist #21:

“Imposts, excises, and, in general, all duties upon articles of consumption, may be compared to a fluid, which will, in time, find its level with the means of paying them. The amount to be contributed by each citizen will in a degree be at his own option, and can be regulated by an attention to his resources. ...If duties are too high, they lessen the consumption; the collection is eluded; and the product to the treasury is not so great as when they are confined within proper and moderate bounds. This forms a complete barrier against any material oppression of the citizens by taxes of this class, and is itself a natural limitation of the power of imposing them.”

What we've got today is simply the direct (and perfectly predictable) consequences of NOT adhering to the Founders' plan. As Frederick Douglass trenchantly observed,

“Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have the exact measure of the injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them."

We've got plenty of injustice and wrong these days. But our fix to the problem was bought for us with blood a few hundred years ago.

All we have to do is stop playing along with the rogue state's false (and rather embarrassingly crude) paradigm  concerning who owns what, and what powers to tax have really been granted. As soon as enough of us quit endorsing that nonsense, it's all good

Care to post a comment on this article?

 

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

 

Return to contents

 

Are You Ready For More Power?

 

   

"Peter Hendrickson has done it again!  'Upholding The Law' does for individual liberties what 'Cracking the Code' did for tax law compliance: exposes the reader to the unalienable truth!"

-Jesse Herron, Bill Of Rights Press, Fort Collins, Colorado

 

GETTING IT GOOD AND HARD

A brief look at 100 years of Fiscal Folly; and a nice confirmation of CtC scholarship using four-generation-old data from the IRS itself.

 

CtC-Educated Lawyers: It's Way Past Time For You All To Queue Up!

 

[Y]ou really need to familiarize yourself with Pete Hendrickson's absolutely magnificent work at his website and in his book(s).  He has, brilliantly and lucidly, "cracked the code" regarding the federal income EXCISE tax(es)."

-Mark C. Phillips, JD

 

"...I find your work fascinatingly simple to understand."

-Jerry Arnowitz, JD

 

"Your book is a masterpiece!"

-Michael Carver, JD

 

"Received your book yesterday.  Started reading at 11 PM, finished at 4 AM."  "I have 16 feet (literally 16' 4.5") of documents supporting just about everything in your book." "Your book should be required reading for every lawyer before being admitted to any Bar."  "I hope you sell a million of them." 

-John O'Neil Green, JD

 

“Thanks again for your efforts, Pete. They mean an awful lot to a lot of people.” “…as an attorney, I am humbled by your knowledge and ability in navigating the law.  THANK YOU for your hard work and sacrifice.”

-Eric Smithers, JD

 

"I am an attorney and want to give a testimonial to your book, which I find to be compelling. I am exercising these rights for myself and my adult children. I'm even considering making this my new avenue of law practice."

Nancy "Ana" Garner, JD

 

Learn what these colleagues already know, then step forward and become part of a coordinated, mutually-supportive squadron focused on developing strategy and deploying the law in courtrooms across the country.  There's a lot of suing that needs doing right now.

 

Are you ready for a challenge that'll put some real meaning behind all the effort you went through to get your credentials?  Send me an email. 

 

Have You Taken A Military, Law Enforcement or Public Office Oath To Uphold And Defend The Constitution?

 

Renew Your Promise

 

*****

 

Illuminating anniversaries of this week:

April 29- In 1770, James Cook arrives at what he names 'Botany Bay' in Australia.  In 1968, 'Hair' opens on Broadway.  In 1974, Richard Nixon releases an edited version of the Watergate-related tape recordings made in the Oval Office.  In 1975, the United States begins evacuating Americans from Saigon in the expectation of its imminent fall to North Vietnamese forces.  In 1986, Roger Clemens throws 20 strikeouts in nine innings.  In 1992, riots break out in Los Angeles after the acquittal of police officers on trial for use of excessive force in the arrest of Rodney King.  In 2004, Oldsmobile builds its final car; and George W. Bush and Dick Cheney "testify" before the "9/11 Commission", refusing to be under oath, recorded, or witnessed by anyone but the two commission members allowed to be present, and insisting on "testifying" in each other's presence.

 

  IGNORANCE TAX: An unnecessary exaction suffered out of ignorance as to its lawful objects and the means of its application by someone too lazy, frightened or misled to learn how it really works and to what it really applies.  See "Income Tax", "Social Security Tax", "Medicare Tax" and "Federal Unemployment Tax".

 

An Introduction To The Liberating Truth In Ten Easy Segments

Tom Bottaro, CFC, CtCW, author of 'Secrets of the Income Tax Code- A Guide for Businessmen', has shared another fine outreach effort. Tom has been writing and sending a series of short wake-up and educational essays to friends and family, one by one, for some time. When Tom told me about this, I asked him to compile the pieces and let me post them for everyone to enjoy and share with their own people. Tom, good guy and warrior for the truth that he is, was perfectly agreeable.

Here is the compilation in printable .pdf format. I hope everyone will indeed share it widely. 

 

"It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the Government from falling into error."

-United States Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson

 

 

SPOTLIGHT on ACTIVISM

 

CtC Warrior David Sides says, "Bumper stickers?  Nice, but NOT BIG ENOUGH!"

 

(By the way, Dave's got it precisely right-- If you want your power to be secure, your neighbors have to be empowered with the same knowledge that you've acquired.  Click here for ideas about spreading the truth-- which include normal bumper stickers available for free, by the way....)

 

***

 

Photographed on 1-70 in Missouri

 

***

 

At a rally outside the Alamo

 

***

 

CtC Warrior Brian H. in Alaska has a great INDOOR approach to spreading the transformational truth. Here's Brian's desk at his workplace:

 

 

You notice the big glass container to the right of the CtC in the first pic above? Tasty freebies for Brian's co-workers-- candy and brain-candy all in one:

 

 

Very sweet!

 

*****

 

'Don't Tread On Me' Polo Shirts Say It All!

 

 

Click Here To Get Yours Now!

 

*****

 

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST 'TAX TIP'

 

 

More Than Two Thirds Of The Several States That Collect "Income" Taxes Have Now Acknowledged The Truth About The Law As Revealed In CtC, And Have Issued Complete Refunds Accordingly!  See The Following Chart...

 

 

Illuminating anniversaries of this week:

April 30- In 1492, Christopher Columbus receives his royal commission.  In 1789, George Washington takes the oath of office as the first President of the United States.  Unlike modern holders of the office (and a few bad moves during his tenure notwithstanding), he means it.  In 1803, the United States purchases the Louisiana Territory from France for $15 million.  In 1812, the Territory of Orleans becomes the 18th of the several states, styling itself 'Louisiana'.  In 1900, Hawaii is declared a territory of the United States, with Sanford B. Dole as governor.  In 1900, Casey Jones wrecks the Cannonball Express.  In 1927, the first United States federal prison for women opens.  In 1938, Porky Pig goes on his first rabbit hunt.  In 1945, Adolph Hitler and Eva Braun commit suicide.  In 1993, the World Wide Web goes public.  In 2004, photos of grotesque detainee abuse by officials at the United States Abu Ghraib prison facility in Iraq make it to the media.  In 2009, Chrysler files for bankruptcy.

 

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

 

'The BOSTONIAN'S Paying the EXCISE-MAN, or TARRING & FEATHERING' (1774)

(How our forefathers responded to arrogant "Rule of Law defiers"...)

 

*****

 

LostHorizons.com traffic stats now available for the past year (March 1, 2012 to March 1, 2013) show approximately:

6,000,000 hits and 2,000,000 page views during that period!

YOU DIDN'T THINK YOU WERE ALL ALONE, DID YOU?

 

*****

 

HELP SPREAD THE LIBERATING TRUTH ABOUT THE TAX

“All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”

-Arthur Schopenhauer

 

Get your FREE* CtC bumper sticker and help spread the word!

Just send a stamped, self-addressed envelope to Lost Horizons, Bumper Sticker Offer, 232 Oriole Rd., Commerce Twp., MI 48382

(*If you want to throw a few bucks into the envelope to help with costs, that'd be nice, but it's entirely optional...)

 

*****

 

If You're Not Standing Up, Then You're Standing Down

...and "standing down" means "going down"...

 

MY FRIENDS, IT IS MY SINCERE BELIEF that this community of activists has been encouraged, inspired, enlightened and expanded over the years by the steady posting here of your ongoing victories on behalf of the rule of law. Certainly, it has been my pride and my joy to help you share with the world your honorable testament to the liberating truth about the tax, widespread knowledge of which is so critical to the well-being of ourselves, our children, and our beloved America.

 

However, unless YOU send those victories I can't post them. Unless YOU stand up, your courage and commitment can't inspire anyone.

 

YOU WILL RECALL THAT FOR THE LAST YEAR OR SO I've been telling you that we are in a transformational moment. Look around at what is going on today and recognize the truth of what I say.

 

More than half the American population views government as a threat. As mainstream a publication as Forbes magazine is posting articles about massive DHS ammunition and armored vehicle purchases. Denunciations of the NSA violations are features in every major MSM organ.

 

Even before Edward Snowden's documentation of particular crimes being committed against the American people the LA Times, NY Times, Washington Times and other mainstream organs were editorializing about Leviathan having grown too big, and gotten dangerously out-of-hand (see stories at each of the preceding links). In the Spring Rand Paul's filibuster denouncing the lawlessness of Mordor-on-the-Potomac prompted a major buzz across the country, and in July Justin Amash shocked Washington by very nearly defunding a huge portion of the illegal surveillance state's crimes.

 

Concurrently, this CtC community has been winning legal victories and refunds which are ever-more significant and telling. Consider, for instance, the victories which have qualified for the EWWBL collection. Every one of these is an especially illuminating acknowledgement of the truth about the tax, and now include a very significant two-time victory in a federal district court.

 

Things are happening!

 

HOW IT ALL SHAKES OUT is still up for grabs, though. This is not the time for either complacency or paralysis, because both of those don't amount to "doing nothing"-- instead they amount to "standing down". And standing down means conceding the fight, letting all these eleventh-hour sparks of light burn out unnurtured and the moment be a transformation for the worse.

 

This is not the time for standing down. This is the time for a FULL-COURT PRESS.

 

This is the time for educated American grown-ups to stand up tall and firm, pulling others to their feet by their very gravity. This is the time for leading the way.

 

STAND UP! SEND THOSE VICTORIES-- the new ones, and those of the last few years as well. Click here to learn how. Even if you don't have checks to scan, send your testimonials. Learn how to do that here.

 

 

 

The Willingness Of Some People To Trade Liberty For Convenience Is Without Limit

Some Observations About Current Political Efforts To Evade The Truth, Such As The "Fair Tax" Scheme

 

Regarding "Tax Reform"

 

"Taxes are not raised to carry on wars, wars are raised to carry on taxes."

-Thomas Paine

 

Where To Find Things On This Site

 

Law Professor James Duane Says: "Don't Talk To The Police.  Period."

 

Honest Cops Agree...

 

*****

 

The Newsletter is interested in your work!  If you are a writer, scholar, or just a dedicated Warrior with a worth-while story to tell, please consider sharing your words and your wisdom with our thousands of readers!  Click here to learn how.

 

'Letters to the Editor' should be addressed to 'feedback 'at' losthorizons.com', with "Editor" in the subject line.

 

*****

 

Films That Belong In Every Home Library

 

CLICK HERE TO INSTRUCT YOUR CONGRESSIONAL REPRESENTATIVES

 

Ever Wonder How Much An Unrestrained FedState Would Like To Tap You For?

 

*****

 

 

Warrior David Larson shares this beautiful little farce, wryly observing that, "Depositors have "..not lost one penny.." - OK we could agree on that simple statement  ..how about the purchasing power of that same penny 'not lost'?"

 

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics

 

REGARDING MONEY

 

***

 

Illuminating anniversaries of this week:

May 1- In 1328, England recognizes Scotland as an independent state after 32 years of attempted conquest.  In 1931, the Empire State Building in New York City is dedicated.  In 1950, Guam is organized as a "State of the United States".  In 1960, the U2 spyplane piloted by Francis Gary Powers is shot down over the Soviet Union.  In 1971, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is formed.  In 2003, George W. Bush declares: "Mission accomplished!" in Iraq.  In 2006, the government of Puerto Rico closes its Department of Education and 42 other government agencies in responsible recognition of its fiscal situation.  In 2011, Barack Obama announces the assassination of Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad, Pakistan by a crack team of Navy Seals.  The truth of this assertion is unknown.  According to the official story, although arguably the most potentially-useful subject of interrogation in US history (at least in the context of the alleged "terrorist war" paradigm within which all of this happened), and although described as unarmed and easily-taken, bin Laden was instead summarily shot in the head.  No body was ever seen; instead it is claimed that the body was taken away by the SEAL team and then simply dumped at sea.  Considerable evidence exists indicating that bin Laden had actually died years earlier, in December of 2001; further, the series of videos purportedly of bin Laden making various pronouncements useful to the US propaganda campaign supporting its foreign and domestic policies in the intervening years were obvious fakes.

 

Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend

 

Last Word

 

"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains set lightly upon you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."

-Samuel Adams, Architect of the First American Revolution

 

OK, Now Back To Your Regularly Scheduled Programming:

 

 

Is this newsletter of any value to you? If so, please consider a donation

to help keep it available, or it soon won't be. Donations can be sent to:

 

Peter Hendrickson

232 Oriole St.

Commerce Twp., MI  48382

 

Order Books, Warrior-Wear, or The CtC Companion CD

 

An "Income" Tax Related Site Map

 

E-mail this Newsletter to a friend

 

Want to get on the Newsletter mailing list?  Just send an email from the address you want added to SubscribeMe 'at' losthorizons.com with "Subscribe me" in the subject line, and your name in the body!

 

PLEASE CONTINUE TO DILIGENTLY SPREAD THE LIBERATING TRUTH ABOUT THE TAX!!!

 

*****

 

Your Comments

To comment on any article in this newsletter (or to read comments of others), click on the talk balloon below.

(It may take a few moments for your newly-posted comments to appear.)

 

Return to contents

 

*****

 

About The Author

 

Pete Hendrickson is possibly the most effective lawyer in history, even while never having set foot in a law school, nor ever being a card-carrying member of "the bar". He is the first American in history to secure a complete refund of Social Security and Medicare ‘contributions’ withheld from his earnings (along with all other property taken for federal taxes); further, since 2003 students of his legal analyses and arguments in ‘Cracking the Code- The Fascinating Truth About Taxation In America’ (CtC), and its sequel, 'Was Grandpa Really a Moron?' have been routinely retaining and recovering billions of dollars which otherwise-- wrongly, but as a matter of course-- would have gone to federal or state government treasuries. This despite concerted efforts by government to suppress his work, and in some cases vigorously oppose the claims by his students.

 

Hendrickson is also a widely-read essayist on matters of politics, public policy and law; many of these works are collected in his second book, ‘Upholding the Law And Other Observations’.  He is a member of Mensa; an award-winning artist; and has paid his dues as a youth soccer coach.  He is a long-time political activist as well, and has served as co-chair and platform convention delegate of Michigan’s largest county Libertarian Party organization; as a consultant to the National Right to Work Foundation and Citizens for a Sound Economy; as a member of the Heartland Institute; and as a member of the International Society for Individual Liberty.  He is a frequent radio-show guest on stations across the country.

 

Hendrickson's business career has included nearly a decade-and-a-half at the leading edge of the renewable-energy industry, both as Director of Purchasing and Materials Management and member of the R&D board at Starpak Energy Systems, the mid-west's then-largest solar heating and energy-recovery-and re-utilization company; and as founder and president of AFJ Inc., a high-efficiency lighting design, manufacture and installation firm.

 

Beginning in the mid-1990s and continuing for the twelve years before his present full-time focus on the restoration of the rule of law in America, Hendrickson directed purchasing activities for the $84 million-a-year multi-family-housing division of the Farmington Hills, Michigan branch of Edward Rose and Sons, with responsibility for 18,000+ apartments, direct supervision of 35 technicians and agents, and incidental authority over several hundred divisional workers.  He also ran the division's 10 cable television earth-station and distribution systems in four states, and designed and administered the company's website.

 

On rather the other end of the spectrum, amidst these more mundane pursuits Hendrickson co-founded and was the primary creative force behind a small board- and card-game company that enjoyed a modest success for several years.

 

 Hendrickson makes his home in southeast Michigan, with his wife and two children.  He is currently working on his next book.

 

© All written and graphic material on this page and website are copyrighted by Peter E. Hendrickson, unless otherwise attributed